YouTube

DVLA Served Notice

I served the DVLA first of all a Notice of Non-consent before the changes on sharing your personal and private information was deceitfully changed by the corrupt government.

The DVLA have been served the following:

 

 

NON-NEGOTIABLE

©Steven of the family: Kirk
C/o address

NOTICE OF Non-Consent

22 May 2018


RECORDED DELIVERY to
CEO, DVLA JULIE LENNARD GK9584 6956 5GB

Recorded for FRAUD and TREASON purposes. We do not communicate with a PO BOX.

COMMON LAW JURISDICTION APPLIES EXCLUSIVELY

Notice to agent is notice to principal and notice to principal is notice to agent applies.

This is NOT a complaint, a query, a request for a statement/agreement and is NOT to be treated as one. By doing so, you will agree to pay £5,000.00 in damages.
Do not refer to me as Sir, Mr/Mrs/Ms or any title, which is a
legal fiction and is not me. By doing so, you will also agree to pay £5,000,000.00 (FIVE MILLION GBP) in damages.

To CEO, JULIE LENNARD Doing Business as CEO DVLA,

I am contacting you with regards to the legislation being made in parliament by the Government also playing a part in this is the FCA, this legislation will allow anyone to access my account(s) and personal details.

I DO NOT CONSENT to my personal information or account details to be shared with NO ONE, and;

I DO NOT CONSENT to this Tacit agreement by Acquiescence, and;

I DO NOT CONSENT to such a program.

This legislation needs my consent to gain access my personal information and account(s).

You will not gain consent from me due to the Government and FCA’s Underhanded, devious, stealth, smokescreens and mirrors tactics, they have used to commit this fraudulent act against every man, woman and child in Great Britain.

NO ONE EXCEPT FOR MYSELF has consent to have access in any form to my account and personal details, Unless you have my personal written Authorization, witnessed by a commissioner of oath, Notary or solicitor.

ACCESS IS PROHIBITED to NO ONE and at all TIMES, Including but not limited to;

All persons/legal fictions/entities, Corporations Incorporated or Non-Incorporated,

Companies, limited or non- limited, plc and any private businesses/company/corporation.

I HAVE PUT YOU JULIE LENNARD ON NOTICE, AND; YOU AGREE ABSOLUTELY NOT TO ALLOW ANY ACCESS TO MY ACCOUNT AND PERSONAL DETAILS OR ANY INFORMATION WITHOUT MY WITNESSED WRITTEN AUTHORITY AND CONSENT TO DO SO.

If you allow any access whatsoever without my written authorised witnessed consent this WILL BE SEEN AS A TORT, a trespass against myself the living breathing man, by your negligence/ Intent whether directly or indirectly, and therefore you will agree to pay 50 million GBP (£50,000,000.00) in damages.

THEREFORE MAKING YOURSELF LIABLE AND WILL BE REPORTED TO THE RELEVANT AUTHORITIES.

NOTICE IS SERVED BY DELIVERY

On your full commercial liability and penalty of perjury, and; On my full commercial liability and penalty of perjury.

A reply is required, within (10) ten days acknowledging there will be no access to my personal details and or account(s) thank you.

If you fail to reply it will be seen and agreed as a Tacit Agreement by Acquiescence and therefore you will also have agreed with the fee schedule stated herein and also agree totally NOT to share any information to NO ONE.

Find enclosed with this Warning Notice Of Nonconsent is a PDF which is regarding The  “Birth Certificate Fraud; CLAUSULA REBUS SIC STANTIBUS” by kate of kaea.
https://kateofgaia.wordpress.com/

Therefore referring myself the living man to a title “Mr” is legal name fraud and I strongly advice you to address myself as a living man correctly, and NOT as a legal fiction name.

A reply is required with confirmation that the above has been properly addressed and any requests from any unauthorised agents requiring/asking for access to any information what so ever will be flatly refused, immediately denied and a letter sent to myself stating who the corporation/person is requesting to access my account/personal information.

I also wish to De-register 2 motor vehicles with the registration numbers

  • R2xxx xxx

  • FHxx xxx (recently purchased)

I have the right to travel while not engaged in commerce and these are private mode of transport and therefore taxes, mots and insurance are not require by law and it is my right to travel freely.

Therefore I wish for these vehicles to be de-registered they are my private conveyances.

Should there be any forms that need filling out then please send them to me and I will fill them out and return them.

In sincerity and honour, without ill-will, prejudice, frivolity, or vexation with clean hands in equity.

Yours sincerely,

By reasonable Accommodation

Crown: DOE (De Facto)________________________

Sovereign: John-Henry [CD](De Jure)__________________

Private Persons Personal Representative [AB]: Christian________________

To CEO DVLA,
JULIE LENNARD                                                                                                  Yours sincerely,
LONGVIEW ROAD,
MORRISTON,                                                                                                          By:
SWANSEA
SA6 7JL

                                 Sovereign ©Steven of the family: Kirk
Authorized Agent and Representative for STEVEN KIRK™
No assured value, No liability. Errors & Omissions Excepted. All Unalienable Rights Reserved.

WITHOUT RECOURSE – NON-ASSUMPSIT

Calls maybe recorded

End of document.

Seal

Thumb Print

Here was their reply to a lawful notice.

Next because of their total lack and care of duty i served the DVLA with a Notice Of Interest which is below.

NON-NEGOTIABLE

©Steven of the family: Kirk
C/o address

NOTICE OF INTEREST

15 JUNE 2018

Your Ref No: 81062989 Meredik DVRE1_AO D9


RECORDED DELIVERY to
CEO, DVLA JULIE LENNARD GQ 3144 8040 7GB

Previous number sent: GK9584 6956 5GB

Recorded for FRAUD and TREASON purposes. We do not communicate with a PO BOX.

COMMON LAW JURISDICTION APPLIES EXCLUSIVELY

Notice to agent is notice to principal and notice to principal is notice to agent applies.

This is NOT a complaint, a query, a enquiry, a request for a statement/agreement and is NOT to be treated as one. By doing so, you will agree to pay £5,000.00 in damages.
Do not refer to me as Sir, Mr/Mrs/Ms or any title, which is a
legal fiction and is not me. By doing so, you will also agree to pay £5,000,000.00 (FIVE MILLION GBP) in damages.

To CEO, JULIE LENNARD Doing Business as CEO DVLA,

Thank you for your reply dated 07 June 2018 postmarked 08-06-2018 received on the 12th June 2018 from a Kirsty Meredith. Playing down a LAWFUL SERVED NOTICE into a enquiry.

Regulation 27 is not lawful at all it is legal and needs my consent, the only LAWS that actually really matter is common law. ALL ACTS and STATUTES needs MY CONSENT unless you can prove otherwise on your sworn oath in your full commercial liability in affidavit format with the penalty being perjury and a man or woman that takes full liability by actually signing the letter, their sign of nature, unlike the reply I have received no signature no liability.

As quoted in your reply, “The Laws allow the DVLA to release information from the vehicle record to THIRD PARTY COMPANIES” which is totally unlawful. You are chopping and changing legal and lawful and have no idea what you are talking about.

Unless someone driving a car/van/lorry/motorbike has committed a real CRIME like murder, rape, robbery, caused loss or damage then NO ONE has any LAWFUL RIGHT to have any access to my personal information or anyone else’s for that matter that are related to Acts and Statutes or Regulations. Legal is by consent, LAWFUL isn’t those are your god given rights my UNALIENABLE RIGHTS.

Another quote “Information is only released from the driver record where there is a lawful reason to do so” Please give an example of your common law, a lawful reason to give third party interlopers my personal and private information?

Data protection laws have I consented to my information to be shared to all the corrupt corporations including the DVLA corporation? Answer NO, NO, NO I have NOT given my consent it has been obtained by trickery/coercion/tacit or otherwise. If it is for parking tickets, speeding fines or petty rules that have been broken like acts and statutes they all need my consent, which you do not have unless it is for a lawful reason not for legislation, acts or statutes.

Do you actually know the difference between legal and lawful because if you do not you shouldn’t be in office.

Disappointed in your reply is an understatement, you have been served with a Notice of non-consent, a Notice of understanding, intent and claim of rights, NOT REBUTTED and for some reason in your world you seem to think by sending them back stamped with the complaints team dated 24 May 2018 is a rebut or a reply and to further send myself the living man down the legal system to make a complaint, I deal at the Queen Bench with a court de jure. I clearly state I stand under common law only and it is in red ink stating it is not to be treated as a complaint which it has been and therefore you have committed a tort against myself and have agreed to pay five thousand GBP in damages. This is unless you care to rewrite your reply under common law without trying to send myself down the legal route that needs my consent and answer all my questions including
DE-REGISTERING MY PRIVATE CONVEYANCES and my driving licence
instead of cherry picking a single question to try and explain legally and lawfully you are allowed to give out my personal details without my witnessed authority ie my consent. Which is removed, I DO NOT CONSENT as previously stated.

Unless you re-address your letter the following commercial lien process will start.

Under Common Law, all men and women are held accountable for their own behaviour, in their personal and private capacities. Which is ABOVE the statutory system you corporations are hiding behind. It is no longer acceptable for individuals to hide behind the statutory system, if they are responsible for causing harm, loss or injury to others, they are guilty of crimes against the people.

NOTICE

This fiduciary interest in the property, real and moveable, of respondent arises from wilful neglect of duty. Surety for the value of this Notice of Distress is the respondent’s public indemnity insurance bond and, if this is insufficient, all of the respondent’s personal and private property to the value of this notice.

For the avoidance of doubt, claimant intends to make a civil claim valued at present at £5,000.00, five thousand GBP.

Respondent has twenty one (21) days to respond from receipt of this Notice of Interest.

The Commercial Lien Process.
A common Law Commercial Lien is a process that any man or woman can employ in order to obtain Lawful remedy from the actions of another man or woman who have – or have attempted to – or have conspired to – damage said man or woman in some way. Such wrongs are known as “torts” and are the subject of Tort Law. This includes “harassment” such as “threats with menaces” which is considered to be ‘damages’ and also ‘defamation of character’. Which is also considered to ‘damage a reputation’. The reason for this is simple: Since all are equal under the LAW, then each man or woman has a duty of care to each other man or woman, such as to make sure that – whatever action we take towards each other – we have the Common Law behind those actions, and thus can live together in peace. Abrogating said Duty of Care is a CRIMINAL ACT. And constitutes a tort.

THE REST OF THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.

I believe that you have created a tort, or torts against me the living man.

The process comprises:

  1. The subject of the harassment (myself in this case), will write a Statement of Truth (Affidavit), under the penalty of perjury. This being the case, what I will write will be
    “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”, and will thus be based on first hand knowledge.

  2. You will be sent a copy of this Affidavit, comprising my allegations. You will have to REBUT EACH POINT in order to ward off the possibility of a Lien. You will be given 30 (thirty) days to do so, but I can assure you that you will not be able to rebut EVEN ONE SINGLE POINT. You will need to rebut by means of a sworn Affidavit of your own, written under the same criteria, namely: From first-hand knowledge, and under the penalty of perjury.

  3. Any points you do manage to rebut will be removed from my allegations, and the remainder kept as my final Affidavit. The result will be Notarised (by a Notary Public) to become my Statement of Truth, which will not only become THE TRUTH, IN LAW – but will also become A JUDGEMENT, IN LAW.

  4. That being the case, no hearing will be required. Because the judgement has already been made by the truth. (That’s Common Law)

  5. I will then place a Public Advertisement, warning whomsoever may be concerned, that your creditworthiness is henceforth highly suspect. I will inform Credit Reference Agencies to this effect. I would then be LAWFULLY ENTITLED TO SIEZE ANY OF YOUR PROPERTY, up to (and including) the value of the Lien.

  6. This process will occur in a LAWFUL manner, because you are given the chance to REBUT IN SUBSTANCE – and I will thus retain entirely with ‘clean hands in equity.’

  7. As footnotes in bold, I should add that

    a. Even if I have made an honest mistake, WHICH YOU FAILED TO REBUT, my mistake BECOMES THE TRUTH, IN LAW. You will not be able to claim ‘libel’. ‘slander’ or such like, because you were given thirty days to rebut the allegations, before public announcement.

    b. By failure to REBUT IN SUBSTANCE you would have tacitly acquiesced to my Statements as Truths, in Law.

    c. REBUT IN SUBSTANCE does not comprise simply dismissing my allegations. That is mere gainsaying (deny or contradict a fact or statement). “IN SUBSTANCE” means “accompanying with HARD proofs” (in this case, “to the contrary”)

  8. Being Common Law construct, the only way this Lien can be removed is:

    a. By Full Payment … in which case I will remove it

    b. The verdict of a Jury of 12, deciding that the Lien should not have been imposed. But this will require YOU to take ME to a Court De Jure (Common Law Court) …

    whereupon I will be able to explain (to said jury) exactly how you took action which comprised the tort(s) against me WITHOUT ANY LAWFUL EXCUSE WHATSOEVER. DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMATANCES, ASSUME THAT ANY JUDGE CAN REMOVE A LIEN. A JUDGE CANNOT DO THAT,AND JUDGES KNOW THAT (because it is Common Law, NOT A STATUTORY, process)

  9. THAT to ensure payment is made, this lien (if remedy isn’t used) is from the father to the seventh generation and payment is to be secured through the notary office, solicitors office, commissioner of oaths office named on the Lien.

This was your last and final warning. If I receive any further communication from you or any of your agents by means of mail, phone calls, or knocks on my door, then I will undertake the Commercial Lien process against those individual(s) to whom this Notice is addressed.

That is the commercial lien process and will be used should you fail for the second time to address my LAWFUL NOTICES IN A PROPER PROFESSIONAL MANNER then the commercial lien process will start. Trust has well and truly been abused by ALL CORPORATIONS, therefore I DO NOT TRUST YOU AT ALL which is the reasoning for the fee schedules and written correspondences in affidavit format sworn on your commercial liability with the penalty of perjury was your reply anything like this? Answer NO, No it wasn’t just a reply with regulations that do not apply under common law whatsoever.

You all have the same duty of care towards one another as I do and knowingly or unknowingly you corporations are aiding and abetting in fraud, extortion, corruption, tyranny, slavery all by deceit and I for one are totally disgusted with all you pathetic corporations that lie, cheat, steal and murder all for a piece of worthless paper a promissory note, a promise to pay an I.O.U.

I would like to draw your attention to the following documents that are enclosed:

  1. INDICTMENT (A)

  2. A COURTSEY NOTICE

These are extremely serious documents and I suggest you also take them seriously this corruption is over men and women like myself will not tolerate this pathetic behaviour from anyone.

No copies of the Notices that have previously been served will be sent but can be purchased for £20 per copy as you should have kept the Lawful Notices as you will have nothing to defend your case with. The returned stamped Notices which the DVLA have sent back which are a SERVED LAWFUL DOCUMENT will be kept and used as evidence against you.

These are the reasons which are totally indisputable/undeniable and all corporations only have their greedy selves to blame.

I have the right to contract or not to contract and I chose NOT TO CONTRACT which is unlimited and my UNALIENABLE RIGHT.

In sincerity and honour, without ill-will, prejudice, frivolity, or vexation with clean hands in equity.

Yours sincerely,

By reasonable Accommodation

Crown: DOE (De Facto)________________________

Sovereign: John-Henry [CD](De Jure)__________________

Private Persons Personal Representative [AB]: Christian________________

To CEO DVLA,
JULIE LENNARD                                                                                         Yours sincerely,
LONGVIEW ROAD,
MORRISTON,
SWANSEA                                                                                                                 By:
SA6 7JL

By: Sovereign ©Steven of the family: Kirk
Authorized Agent and Representative for STEVEN KIRK™
No assured value, No liability. Errors & Omissions Excepted. All Unalienable Rights Reserved.

WITHOUT RECOURSE – NON-ASSUMPSIT

Calls maybe recorded

End of document.

Seal

Thumb Print

Here was the reply from Cheryl Crabtree.

Next i served the DVLA an affidavit of obligation commercial lien which is below and i had to add someone on the lien as they are interfering/obstruction justice whether knowingly or unknowingly.

 

Our Ref: SK-03072018-DVLA-AOCL                                                                        There is a USSC tracer flag here on all pages

 

Lien Claimant: ©Steven: of the family Kirk
C/o address
Great Britain

Sworn on this date: _________________________

Affidavit of Obligation Commercial Lien

Claimant ©Steven: of the family Kirk

In relation to the individuals who accept liability for the Names:

Julie Lennard,
Kirsty Meredith,
Cheryl Crabtree,
Paul Timms/
Lien Respondents
DVLA
LONGVIEW ROAD
MORRISTON
SWANSEA
SA6 7JL.

From herein known as Lien Respondents.

Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent; Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal Applies.

I, ©Steven: of the family Kirk (as commonly called), being the Undersigned, do solemnly swear, declare, and depose:

1. THAT I am competent to state the matters set forth herein.

2. THAT I have first-hand knowledge of the facts stated herein.

3. THAT all the facts stated herein are true, correct, and certain, admissible as evidence, and if called upon as a witness, I will testify to their veracity.
4. THAT the eternal, unchanged principles of Law are:

  1. A workman is worthy of his hire. Authorities: Exodus 20:15; Lev. 19:13; Matt. 10:10; Luke 10:7; II Tim. 2:6. Legal maxim: “It is against equity for freemen not to have the free disposal of their own property.

  2. All are equal under the law (God’s Law-Moral and Natural Law). Authorities: Exodus 21:23-25; Lev. 24:17-21; Deut. 1:17, 19:21; Matt. 22:36-40; Luke 10:17; Col. 3:25. Legal maxims: “No one is above the law.”; “Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the private gain of a few.”

  3. In commerce, truth is sovereign. See Exodus 20:16; Psalms 117:2; John 8:32; II Cor. 13:8. Legal maxim: “To lie is to go against the mind.”
    Oriental proverb: “Of all that is good, sublimity is supreme.”

  4. Truth is expressed in the form of an Affidavit. See Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev. 19:11-13; Num. 30:2; Matt. 5:33; James 5:12.

  5. A matter must be expressed to be resolved. See Heb. 4:16; Phil. 4:5; Eph. 6:19-21. Legal maxim: “He who fails to assert his rights has none.”

  6. An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce. See 1 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15. Legal maxim: “He who does not deny, admits.”

  7. An unrebutted affidavit becomes a judgment in commerce. See Heb. 6:16-17. Any proceeding in court, tribunal, or arbitration forum consists of a contest, or “duel,” of commercial affidavits wherein the points remaining unrebutted in the end stand as the truth and the matters to which the judgment of the law is applied.

  8. He who leaves the field of battle first (does not respond to Affidavit) loses by default. See Book of Job; Matt 10:22. Legal maxim: “He who does not repel a wrong when he can occasions it.”

  9. Sacrifice is the measure of credibility. One who is not damaged, put at risk, or willing to swear an oath on his commercial liability for the truth of his statements and legitimacy of his actions has no basis to assert claims or charges and forfeits all credibility and right to claim authority. See Acts 7, life/death of Stephen. Legal maxim: “He who bears the burden ought also to derive the benefit.”

  10. A lien or claim, under commercial law, can only be satisfied by one of the following actions. See Gen. 2-3; Matt 4; Revelation. Legal maxim: “If the plaintiff does not prove his case , the defendant is absolved.”

  11. 10.1. A rebuttal Affidavit of Truth, supported by evidence, point-by-point.
    10.2. Payment.
    10.3. Agreement.
    10.4. Resolution by a jury according to the rules of common law.

  12. Guaranteed-All men and women shall have remedy by the due course of law. If a remedy doe not exist, or if the existing remedy has been subverted, then one may create a remedy for themselves and endow it with credibility by expressing it in their Affidavit. (Ignorance of the law might be an excuse, but it is not a valid reason for the commission of a crime when the law is easily and readily available to anyone making a reasonable effort to study the law).

  13. THAT on the 22nd May 2018 I served CEO JULIE LENNARD a Lawful Notice of Non-consent regarding the changes in legislation being introduced on the 25th May 2018 received by signed for service delivery number GK 9584 6956 5GB on the 23rd May 2018 at 08:53am. (Exhibit A and Exhibit B)

  14. Within the Lawful Notice of Non-consent towards the top of the page in very clear readable and understanding text in RED ink so its stands out states “This is NOT a complaint, a query, a request for a statement/agreement and is NOT to be treated as one. By doing so, you will agree to pay £5,000.00 in damages

  15. Within the Lawful Notice of Non-consent towards the top of the page in very clear readable and understanding text in RED ink so its stands out states “Do not refer to me as Sir, Mr/Mrs/Ms or any title, which is a legal fiction and is not me.
    By doing so, you will also agree to pay (£5,000,000.00) FIVE MILLION GBP in damages.

  16. THAT with the said Lawful Notice of Non-consent was enclosed a Lawful Notice of Understanding, Intent and Claim of Right, A Lawful Common Law Birth Certificate, A Lawful Application & Certificate of Ownership, Book of Deeds Extract Lawful Rebellion, A Declaration of Copyright Trademark, The Actual LAWS, UNALIENABLE RIGHTS,
    Birth Certificate FRAUD; CRSS; CLAUSULA REBUS SIC STANTIBUS.

  17. THAT all the above in xvi, were ALL returned to myself on or around the 10th JUNE 2018 by a KIRSTY MEREDITH reference number: 81062989 Meredik DVRE1_AO D9. (Exhibit C and Exhibit D)

  18. THAT the reply from KIRSTY MEREDITH dated 07 JUNE 2018 was addressed to the living man but the contents were all about Statutes and Acts which needs my consent to which has already Served Notice that I DO NOT CONSENT as previously stated in the all Served Lawful Notices, correspondences or documents. (Exhibit C)

  19. THAT the reply from KIRSTY MEREDITH dated 07 JUNE 2018 had no wet ink signature on the letter therefore no liability or responsibility is taken for the letters content.(Exhibit C second page)

  20. Therefore are committing a tort or torts against myself the living breathing flesh and blood sovereign man with a living soul.

  21. Within the served Lawful Notice of Understanding, Intent and Claim of Rights are a fee schedule for being UNLAWFULLY detained, stopped for an unreasonable length of time, arrested for exercising my lawful right to travel in my private conveyance will be billed accordingly. This involves the DVLA and the Police which have been served with exactly the same Notice of Understanding, Intent and Claim of rights. (Exhibit E and Exhibit F)

  22. THAT on the 15th JUNE 2018 I served CEO JULIE LENNARD a Notice of Interest by signed for delivery service number GQ 3144 8040 7GB which was received on the 16th JUNE 2018 at 09:47am. (Exhibit G and Exhibit H)

  23. THAT within the Notice of Interest and the Notice of Non-consent I informed the DVLC to de-register two private conveyances registration numbers R2xx xxx and FHxx xxx and also my driving licence.

  24. THAT on or around the 22 JUNE 2018 I received a reply from a Mr or Mrs (NOBODY), no name, no man or woman claiming responsibility, liability just a scribble for a signature dated 20th JUNE 2018 addressed to the living man (Steven of the family: Kirk) but when opened the contents of the letter are addressing the legal fiction name (Mr Kirk).
    (Exhibit I)

  25. THAT the same said reply included the postcode of my private dwelling and it is not part of any corporation, whereas I do not include the postcode on any correspondences.

  26. THAT the legal fiction name is fraud, evidence was served and the DVLA agreed to pay FIVE MILLION (£5,000,000.00 GBP) IN DAMAGES for the using the legal fiction name. (Exhibit J)

  27. THAT on or around the 25th JUNE 2018 I received a reply to my Notice of Interest from a MRS CHERYL CRABTREE dated 21 JUNE 2018 the complaints team. (Exhibit K)

  28. THAT the said reply letter was address to myself the living man but the letters contents were all about ACTS, which is self-explanatory an Act needs my consent which was removed in my very first lawful Notice that was Served on the 22nd May 2018 and returned to myself by the DVLA. (Exhibit K)

  29. Therefore are committing a tort against myself the living breathing flesh and blood sovereign man with a living soul.

  30. THAT within the same said letter of reply from MRS CHERYL CRABTREE there was no clearly readable wet ink signature on the letter taking full liability for the letters contents. (Exhibit K)

  31. THAT my UNALIENABLE RIGHTS are being TRESPASSED upon by means of legal deception and the DVLA are TRESPASSING on my UNALIENABLE RIGHTS and are therefore committing a tort or torts against myself the living man. I have a Lawful Right to travel in the Ordinary Course of one’s life, the right to contract, or Not to Contract.
    (Exhibit L and Exhibit M)

  32. THAT all corporate laws are secondary to common law which can not be change in any way by the state.

  33. THAT Commercial processes (including this Affidavit and the required responses to it) ARE NON-JUDICIAL and pre-judicial because:
    a. No judge, court, government or any agencies thereof, or any other third parties whatsoever, can abrogate anyone’s Affidavit of Truth; and
    b. Only a party affected by an Affidavit can speak and act for himself and is solely responsible for responding with his own Affidavit of Truth, which no one else can do for him.

  34. THAT the lawful seizure, collection, and transfer of ownership of money or property must be effected by means of a valid Commercial Lien.

  35. THAT I am not the creation or chattel property of any person or any government agency, corporation, private company whatsoever. I am not under any obligation whatsoever to any governmental agency, state or federal (i.e. union), or any of their self-passed laws, statutes, regulations or policies.

  36. THAT any and all of the various papers, documents, adhesion contracts, or “agreements” I may have signed with any government agency, private company, corporations or entity or any others that might be construed to indicate a conclusion contrary to my herein-below assertions were made, signed by me on the basis of mistake due to lack of full disclosure creating a deliberate lack of full knowledge, a deliberate action of fraud, non-disclosure, concealment of material fact, and misrepresentation. Such action thereby creates a stressful situation of duress and intimidation, vitiating all documents by such action of fraud.

  37. THAT it is the sincerest belief and spiritual conviction of this claimant that slavery and peonage are immoral, are violations of the First Precept of Commercial Law (“a workman is worthy of his hire”), that fraud, misrepresentation, nondisclosure, intimidation, deceit, concealment of material fact, lying, and treachery are morally wrong.

  38. THAT I have absolutely no desire whatsoever to be a “client” (slave) of any governmental agency, state or federal (i.e. union), or any of their Principals, or the “United Kingdom,” or to incur any debts or obligations to said entities for whatever “benefits” said entities might purpose to provide or seek to provide to this claimant, or be directed by, subject to, or accountable to any parties other than my own conscience and best judgement for the purpose of preserving inviolate my unalienable/inalienable indefeasible rights to life, liberty, freedom and property while engaging in the honourable, productive, and non-harmful activities of my life.

  39. THAT I, ©Steven: of the family Kirk, am the sole and absolute owner of myself, my body, and my estate, and possess unconditional, allodial, sovereign title thereto, and that I abjure, renounce, forsake, and disavow utterly and absolutely now and forever all presumptions of power, authority, or right by any governmental agency, private companies, corporations, its Principals, over the rights, life, liberty, freedom or property of this claimant from whatever source presumed or derived.

  40. THAT I, the claimant, am NOT a Legal Fiction Person or Person (as defined in a Law Dictionary) “MR STEVEN KIRK” as being a Corporate Entity (incorporated or non-incorporated) or some other kind of Partnership, BUT INSTEAD a living breathing, sovereign, flesh and blood man with a living soul, with a distinct Mind that is capable of possessing personal knowledge commonly called ©Steven: (of the family Kirk, when necessary to distinguish my Clan).

  41. THAT I provided my proof of claim, my evidence, fee schedules which the Lien Respondents entered on their own accord and was billed as per the fee schedule which The Lien Respondents agreed to.

  42. THAT I, Steven: of the family Kirk, the Undersigned, herewith and herein demand of “The Lien Respondents” to furnish answers these claims stated herein.

  43. THAT if “The Lien Respondents“, believes their actions against me carry the force of Law behind them, let them show the Common Law precedent.,

  44. Why did The Lien Respondents not (i) stop referring my person to a legal fiction when I asked politely but with consequences should The Lien Respondents chose to continue to do so? (ii) The Lien Respondents knew the consequences, why continue?, (iii) What Authority Does The Lien Respondents and their agents/representatives claim to have over me, as no man has the right to tell another man what to do and to keep continually harassing me, threatening me and trying to extort money out of me by menace under duress when I am not liable, stop treating a LAWFUL NOTICE as a complaint when I asked politely Why?

  45. You The Lien Respondents have and still are committing a Tort against me, a civil wrong The Lien Respondents you are Tortfeasor’s, every man woman and child has a duty of care towards each other and The Lien Respondents are no exception,

  46. THAT all parties who act against this claimant on their alleged basis must produce the Commercial Affidavits of TRUTH, sworn by the claimants to be “true, correct, and complete (certain),” which prove the origin and foundation of their claims and include providing the contract(s) or agreement(s) with the signature of this claimant thereon wherein this claimant has knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily, in full legal and lawful capacity, agreed to waive or surrender rights to “The Lien Respondents” their Principals, or the “United Kingdom” or agreed to become subject to or the slave or property of said entities in any way or in any jurisdiction whatsoever.

  47. In order for a crime to exist, four elements must exist; there must be a defined crime, there must be a victim, and that the victim must have been damaged, and the intent must be established on the part of the accused. Without proof of all four elements, no crime can said to have been committed. In this Affidavit, crimes are defined – namely the unlawful ejection and the lack of Duty of Care, the claimant is the victim, this Affidavit verifies the damages, and the intent is established at the end of the thirty (30) day grace period, if the Lien Respondents fail to rebut (respond to) the wrongs they have been a party to as noted herein.

  48. NOTICE is hereby given, and demands made, on

  1. The Lien Respondents
    THAT a
    ll Parties who proceed to act or assist in said actions, against this claimant, ©Steven: of the family Kirk, without thorough, verifiable, point-by-point rebuttal of each and every point set forth in this Affidavit shall be immediately added to the Notice of Distress herein as surety for the Lien for damages of Eight Million GBP (£8,000,000.00) and charged with criminal fraud, theft, conspiracy of extortion, theft and fraud, and commercial liens shall be placed against all their real and personal properties (defined crimes: criminal conspiracy, robbery, misprision of felony, conspiracy against the rights of peoples, extortion, fraud and false statements, and other such crimes as are related to issues of RACKETEERING plus such Constitutional violations not listed combined and described simply as TREASON); and

  2. All court costs and legal fees relating to this instant case shall be paid by those who have drawn the Undersigned claimant ©Steven: of the family Kirk into this instant matter.

  3. THAT failure to respond as herein required to this claimant, within the herein a prescribed time of thirty (30) days will be deemed by this claimant to invoke the doctrine of acquiescence and admission, to recover, in commerce, for damages, penalties, interest and costs.

  4. THAT this Commercial Affidavit, Notice and Warning of Commercial Grace, is the ONE AND ONLY such Notice and Warning. If all actions are not abated within thirty (30) days, or if at any time in the future any actions are reinstated, it shall be considered a wilful disregard for this Notice and Warning, and such shall engender the immediate filing of Criminal Complaints (Affidavits of Information) and Commercial Liens (Affidavits of Obligation) against all parties involved.

  5. THAT the foundation of Commercial Law, being based on certain eternally just, valid, and moral precepts, has remained unchanged for at least six (6) millennia. Said Commercial Law forms the underpinnings of Western Civilization if not all Nations, Law, and Commerce in the world, is NON-JUDICIAL, and is prior and superior to, the basis of, and cannot be set aside or overruled by, the statutes of any governments, legislatures, quasi-governmental agencies, or courts. It is therefore an inherent obligation on all Authorities, Officials, Governments, Legislatures, Governmental or Quasi-governmental Agencies, Courts, Judges, Attorneys, and all aspects and Agents of all Law Enforcement Agencies to uphold said Commercial Law, without which said entities are violating the just basis of their alleged authority and serving to disintegrate the society they allegedly exist to protect.

  6. CONTRACT OF LIABILITY FOR ALLEGATIONS THAT is the Respondent’s,
    MRS JULIE LENNARD, “JULIE LENNARD,
    MRS KIRSTY MEREDITH, KIRSTY MEREDITH,
    MRS CHERYL CRABTREE CHERYL CRABTREE,
    MR PAUL TIMMS” OR PAUL TIMMS”

  7. THAT only I, the living man involved against my free will in this instant matter, can determine how much stress, and other disturbance to my life and I have suffered by virtue of being UNLAWFULLY advised on Acts and Statues to a non existent contract, and for the use of the legal fiction name fraud and consequently only I am in the position of decide and dictate, my desired compensation, being the amount of EIGHT MILLION POUNDS GBP per Respondent (£8,000.000.00 per respondent) for all combined attempts to trespass on my absolute sovereignty, that being the sum total demanded by this Commercial Lien on the individuals who accepts liability for the Names; Are as follows
    Mrs Julie Lennard, “Julie Lennard,
    Mrs Kirsty Meredith, Kirsty Meredith,
    Mrs Cheryl Crabtree Cheryl Crabtree,
    Mr Paul Timms” Or Paul Timms”

  8. THAT by specifically offering “The Lien Respondents” the chance to apologise in writing (although the opportunity has always been there for the taking) via a Notice of Interest, dated 15th JUNE 2018 received on dated 16th JUNE 2018 at am 09:47am, in this instant matter, I come to this position with clean hands in equity as having shown good faith.

  9. THAT for all the purposes of all of the forgoing, all references to “ The Lien Respondents shall be construed to refer to individuals who considers their Legal Fiction Name to be

    MRS JULIE LENNARD, “JULIE LENNARD,
    MRS KIRSTY MEREDITH, KIRSTY MEREDITH,
    MRS CHERYL CRABTREE CHERYL CRABTREE,
    MR PAUL TIMMS” OR PAUL TIMMS”

    or any variant thereof, including Names phonetically sounding the same or similar, and who can accept service via .

DVLA
LONGVIEW ROAD,
MORRISTON,
SWANSEA,
SA6 7JL

  1. THAT I, ©Steven: of the family Kirk, the Undersigned claimant, depose and certify that I have written the foregoing with intent and understanding of purpose, and believe the statements, allegations, demands and contents herein to be true, correct, and complete, commercially reasonable, and just, to the best of my knowledge and belief.

  2. REBUT IN SUBSTANCE does not comprise simply dismissing my allegations. That is mere gainsaying (deny or contradict a fact or statement). “IN SUBSTANCE” means “accompanying with HARD proofs” (in this case, “to the contrary”) under common law.

That to ensure payment is made, this lien is from the father to the seventh generation and payment is to be secured through the notary/solicitor/commissioner of oath’s office named herein. Surety for the value of this Notice of Distress is the respondent’s public indemnity insurance bond and, if this is insufficient, all of the respondent’s personal and private property to the value of this notice.


The Lien Respondents now have thirty (30) days to rebut point for point or pay up, any points you manage to rebut will be removed from my allegations, and the remainder kept as my final Affidavit. The result will be Notarised (by a Notary Public) or Commission of Oath to become my Statement Truth, which will not only become THE TRUTH, IN LAW – but will also become
A JUDGEMENT, IN LAW.

All responses must be made in the form of an affidavit, sworn and subscribed, witnessed, under penalty of perjury, your full commercial liability and sent to the notary or commissioner of oaths office address below within thirty (30) days of receipt of this instrument.

The Lien Claimant currently values this Affidavit of Obligation commercial lien at Five Million and 10 thousand GBP (£5,010.000.00) for the tacit agreement by admission or EIGHT MILLION GBP (£8,000,000.00) per Lien Respondent.

All evidence has been provided in all served Lawful Notices and correspondences. Therefore the Sum Certain for this True Bill in commerce is Five Million Ten Thousand GBP (£5,010,000.00) to be settled within thirty (30) days of receipt of this Affidavit of Obligation by the DVLA. Failure to settle within the given time of thirty (30) days, then the Lien Respondents will become liable by tacit agreement by acquiescence to this Affidavit of Obligation Commercial Lien to the value of EIGHT MILLION GBP (£8,000,000.00) per Respondent for Trespass for a wilful lack of duty and care. Therefore willingly and unlawfully Trespassing on my Sovereignty and my Unalienable Rights either knowingly or unknowingly.

* All words herein are as Lien Claimant defines them.

NOTICE OF DISTRESS.

Any man or woman named below will have been added to this Affidavit of Obligation Commercial Lien as surety for the Lien and as a Lien Debtor to this Lien to the value of Eight Million GBP (£8,000,000.00) per offender for perverting the cause of justice, declining or refusing to administer for the record this Affidavit of Obligation or generally interfering with the due process of Law.

  1. Man or Woman Name: Paul Timms

    Date: 28th August 2018

    Where and when
    offence took place:
    Fraudulent letter received from Paul Timms clearly admitting who is responsible for any/all statutes and acts regarding the right to travel and has clearly identified ‘you’ as the party liable for these acts and statutes to apply to. Therefore has willfully aided and abetted in fraud against myself the living breathing flesh and blood sovereign man. Therefore has agreed totally to be added to the commercial lien as a debtor to the value stated herein.

    Name:____________________________________________________________________

  2. Man or Woman Name:_____________________________

    Date:______________________________

    Where and when
    offence took place:_____________________________________________________________________

    __________________________________________________________________________

    Company/corporations
    Name:____________________________________________________________________

  3. Man or Woman Name:_____________________________

    Date:______________________________

    Where and when
    offence took place:_____________________________________________________________________

    __________________________________________________________________________

    Company/corporations
    Name:____________________________________________________________________

I ©Steven: of the family Kirk, certify upon my oath, under penalty of perjury and my own full commercial liability, that the contents of this Affidavit of Obligation are true, correct, complete, and not meant to mislead.

I strongly advice you seek lawful advice on this issue.

Leviticus 26 verse 23-24
And if yea will not be reformed by me by these things but will walk contrary unto me then I will also walk contrary unto you and will punish you seven times for your sins.

In sincerity and honour, without ill-will, prejudice, frivolity, or vexation with clean hands in equity.

By reasonable Accommodation

Crown: DOE (De Facto)________________________

Sovereign: John-Henry [CD](De Jure)__________________

Private Persons Personal Representative [AB]: Christian________________

To CEO DVLA,
Julie Lennard,
Kirsty Meredith,
Cheryl Crabtree
,
Paul Timms,
LONGVIEW ROAD,
MORRISTON,
SWANSEA,                                                                                                                     Yours sincerely,
SA9 7JL
                                                                                                                                        By:

By: Sovereign ©Steven of the family: Kirk
Authorized Agent and Representative for STEVEN KIRK™
No assured value, No liability. Errors & Omissions Excepted. All Unalienable Rights Reserved.

WITHOUT RECOURSE – NON-ASSUMPSIT

Calls maybe recorded

Seal

Thumb Print

1. ©Steven: of the family Kirk, certify on my own commercial liability that I have read the above and I have grounds and do believe the above acts were committed contrary to Law and to the best of my knowledge and recollection it is true, correct and complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

Signed, Sworn and sealed this seventeenth day of October two thousand and eighteen, 17th October 2018.

All rights reserved.

By: ______________________________ (claimant)

©Steven: of the family Kirk, in rerum natura

*Sui Juris

Acknowledgment

For verification purposes only

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me by ©Steven: of the family Kirk, known to me or proven to me to be the real man signing this Affidavit this

_______________________ day of _________________________, 20_____.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

___________________________________ ________________________________ (Seal/Signature)

NOTARY PUBLIC [Print Name]
SOLICITORS

COMMISSIONER OF OATHS

Sworn at:

 

End of document.

Here was the letter that Paul Timms thought was a reply to a affidavit which is a joke of a reply and he willfully tried to deceive me by a single word ‘you’ he stated that you have to pay and you are responsible etc but who is you. It is like every person must do this, well i am not a person, a human, a Mr, a legal fiction i am a man plain and simple it is they who use these words to deceive everyone and that was the reason Paul Timms was added to the lien.

The original affidavit of obligation commercial lien was ignored by the lien debtors and at the time there was 3 names on the lien all women until Paul Timms decided to have a try to continue the charade. So i then served them a Notice of Fault Opportunity To Cure on the 13th August 2018.

As everyone can clearly see Paul Timms identifies exactly who is liable for all statutes and acts ‘you’ is the fiction that is responsible for all the acts and statutes and not myself the flesh and blood living man and therefore by his own stupidity has agreed to be a lien debtor to the value of Eight Million.

NOTICE OF FAULT AND OPPORTUNITY
TO CURE

Parties: Steven Kirk/Lien Claimant

(Secured Creditor)

c/o address

Our Ref: SK-03072018-DVLA-NOICL

To Julie Lennard,

Kirsty Meredith,

Cheryl Crabtree/ Lien Debtors

DVLA
Longview Road
Morriston
Swansea
SA6 7JL

Other PARTIES/Lien Debtor:

JOHN DOES 1-10

Affidavit of Obligation Commercial Lien sworn and subscribed at DIXON COLES & GODDARD

VERIFICATION

Great Britain                    )
                                         ) Verified Declaration
Leicester, Leicester-shire )

Declarant, Steven Kirk, on his Commercial Oath with unlimited liability, proceeding in good faith, being of sound mind states: the facts contained herein are true, correct, and complete/certain and not misleading to the best of Declarant’s private first hand knowledge and understanding “So-help-me-God” under penalty of International Commercial Law.

_________________________

Steven Kirk

Of Leicester  }
                      } ss
Great Britain }

Sworn & Subscribed before me, __________________________, a Commissioner of Oaths, this

____________________day of _____________________20___.

____________________________________

Commissioner of Oath

STATEMENT OF FACTS

    1. On the 04rd JULY 2018 Lien Debtors received service of Affidavit of Obligation Commercial Lien by signed for recorded delivery service number GQ3144 8049 0GB.

    2. Neither of the Lien Debtors as of the 13th AUGUST 2018 has not responded to the said Affidavit of Obligation Commercial Lien above nor effected the remedy.

    3. Lien Debtors are at fault.

    4. As an operation of law Lien Debtors by dishonour of the Affidavit of Obligation Commercial Lien has caused Affidavit of Obligation Commercial Lien to turn into an ‘account receivable’.

OPPORTUNITY TO CURE

In the event that Lien Debtor’s failure to take the remedy offered in AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION COMMERCIAL LIEN was an oversight, mistake or otherwise unintentional, Steven: Kirk/Lien Claimant grants Lien Debtors three (3) days, exclusive of the day of receipt, to cure the fault and effect the remedy.

Failure to cure will constitute, as an operation of law, the FINAL admission of the obligation by Lien Debtors through tacit procuration (Procurations are either express or implied; an express procuration is one made by the express consent of the parties; the implied or tacit takes place when an individual sees another managing his affairs, and does not interfere to prevent it) to the Affidavit of Obligation Commercial Lien and the whole matter shall be deemed stare decisis.(To abide by or adhere to, decided cases)

Response by Lien Debtors must be served on Steven Kirk/Lien Claimant exactly as provided:

Steven: Kirk

(Secured Creditor)

c/o address

Steven: Kirk/Lien Claimant awaits Lien Debtor’s timely response.

Given under my hand and seal this the 13th AUGUST 2018

By: _______________________________

Steven: Kirk/Secured Creditor/Lien Claimant

 

I gave the DVLA 3 days to reply to the Notice of Fault Opportunity To Cure and i received nothing in reply to an obligation to rebut my allegations, no reply from the DVLA to an Affidavit of Obligation.

After the three days had gone by i went and got a Notice of Default Default Certificate which is below.

DEFAULT CERTIFICATE

NOTICE OF DEFAULT

RECORDING REQUESTED BY

Parties: Steven: Kirk/Lien Claimant/Affiant

(Secured Creditor)

c/o address

Our Ref: SK-03072018-DVLA-AOCL

AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

To:

Julie Lennard,
Kirsty Meredith,
Cheryl Crabtree/ Lien Debtors

DVLA
Longview Road,
Morriston,
Swansea
SA6 7JL

CERTIFIATE OF DEFAULT

AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE

To: Julie Lennard,
Kirsty Meredith,
Cheryl Crabtree/ Lien Debtors

DVLA
Longview Road,
Morriston,
Swansea
SA6 7JL

You are hereby noticed that you are in default of an opportunity to respond to the affidavit of obligation commercial lien (Our Ref: SK-03072018-DVLA-AOCL) sent to the lien debtors and received on the 04th july 2018 by certified mail signed for delivery service recorded delivery number GQ3144 8049 0GB and also notice of fault with opportunity to cure sent to the lien debtors and received on the 14th august 2018 by certified mail signed for delivery service recorded delivery number GQ3144 8079 5GB.

  1. The Lien Debtors were given the opportunity to rebut the claims/allegations and fees for damages that i the Lien Claimant made against you the Lien Debtors by your failure to answer said affidavit.

  2. A default judgement is being sort against you the Respondents having waived the right to answer by acquiescence, tacit admission and failure to consent, by rejecting your due process opportunity.

  3. In absence of such response, Affiant Steven: Kirk, hereby inserts and records this default certificate upon and against above named Respondents herein. All of the individuals concerned chose not to respond, chose not to negotiate a settlement and chose not to defend their conduct, this is despite twice being given the opportunity to do so, with the served affidavit of obligation commercial lien and the notice of fault and opportunity to cure.

  4. Whereas such actions now shall be taken in accordance to the procedures set forth in the
    un-rebutted affidavit of obligation commercial lien served on the 04
    th july 2018 by certified mail signed for delivery service recorded delivery number GQ3144 8049 0GB.

Affidavit notice of default sworn and subscribed at DIXON COLES & GODDARD

VERIFICATION

Great Britain )

) Verified Declaration

Leicester, Leicester-shire )

Declarant, Steven: Kirk, on his Commercial Oath with unlimited liability, proceeding in good faith, being of sound mind states: the facts contained herein are true, correct, and complete/certain and not misleading to the best of Declarant’s private first hand knowledge and understanding “So-help-me-God” under penalty of International Commercial Law.

_________________________

Steven: Kirk, *Sui Juris

Of Leicester  }
                      } ss
Great Britain }

Sworn & Subscribed before me, _______________________________________, a Commissioner of Oaths,

this____________________day of _____________________20___.

____________________________________

Commissioner of Oath

Given under my hand and seal this the 20th AUGUST 2018

By: _______________________________

Steven: Kirk, *Sui Juris

* Sui Juris Of his own right: possessing full social and civil rights; not under any legal disability, or the power of another, or guardianship. Having capacity to manage one’s own affairs; not under legal disability to act for one’s self.

End of Document.

Having served many different foreclosed corrupt criminal corporations not one have replied and this is proving everything and they do not give a shit at all just carry on with the corruption, lies, deceit, enslavement, tyranny the list of crimes is endless.

To be continued..